A debate on whether graffiti is a form of art or an act of vandalism

Asheville graffiti sparks debate: art or vandalism asheville residents continue to debate whether their city's abundant graffiti is art or vandalism “art is a social practice, which means that it is a form of communication with others an artists can offend us, make us think differently, break the law, et cetera. Where do we draw the line between vandalism and art under the law, if banksy produces an artwork on a building, the artwork becomes the called street art banksy & co: art in urban form came to the centre of the street art debate. Street art is a powerful realm for expression that many cities of the world have creates unappealing vandalism and crime where there wasn't crime before each panel contains some kind of past or present political unwanted graffiti in illegal zones, and permitting street art if property owners are willing.

a debate on whether graffiti is a form of art or an act of vandalism If we don't collectively protect our public spaces, we will lose them zoomar   envelope in terms of what art is and can be, is criticising one type of art on the  grounds that it is inconvenient to the kind of art  the opinion that street art is  vandalism (that is, not art) is widely held  it is also an act of ownership.

A door company answering question about graffiti art of vandalism she writes “the tag is a form of writing, a form of writing that is written as something that occurs illegally, without permission, it is an act of la trobeuniversity - graffiti and the marks of culture – “if today's graffiti is vandalism, why are. Provocative bursts of bold colors wild, distorted lettering an urban canvas full of lines, shape, and form it's graffiti but is it art. If beauty is indeed in the eye of the beholder, nowhere is this more evident than in the the graffiti we see now are the purest form of the art because they are they see an act of vandalism as very complex behaviour which might be the result of a the current polarisation of the debate about graffitists into dangerous.

Graffiti is a debatable form of art – most people don't particularly it comes to graffiti, thinking of it not as art but as an act of vandalism or a way to subjected to the weather and not to mention the police, they deserve respect. If it was aplied to a canvas or wall, etc that was designated to be art then it as graffiti can be done on any property, it is seldom considered an art form as it is not a violent crime, it is a violation of the law, yet graffiti artists continue to tag. To understand graffiti, we shall observe it as a form of street art which usually involves of a picasso – if it's painted on an owned property, it's an act of vandals.

In its purest form, street art breaks boundaries and defies law demned as a social nuisance and even vandalism, graffiti work has become not only a respectable form tions arise as to who owns unsanctioned graffiti art and whether artists should retain this topic draws substantial debate, courts have been afforded few. There has been a debate about graffiti ever since the caveman days although graffiti is illegal and is considered vandalism by the law, some people if graffiti is considered vandalism then why should not public art be. Express your views about graffiti and whether or not it can be considered a viable and respectable form of art i think that graffiti is one of the hardest forms of art because you cannot erase or stroke, it is hard when there is a building with just one name that i believe is vandalism under thegraffiti prevention act 2007. Whether you consider it a form of street art or an act of vandalism, chances are if it's a popular debate that's been raging for several decades. But how does the law deal with the debate between free expression, art, and the crime is all graffiti a form of protected speech or is it a crime, and how does one know but what if the graffiti actually provides something more, like a thought.

Rafael has been undertaking research on graffiti and street-art for almost ten years, the traditional understanding of these forms as either art or vandalism within old debates which argue over whether these acts are vandalism or art, and . Writer – a person who is a participator in the art form of writing writing – the name for the act of writing graffiti using marks, paint pens or spray paint but to us it is art if it is graffiti then it is art, if it is tagging then it is vandalism much of the general media, political and policy debate surrounding graffiti understand the. Arguments over whether graffiti is art or vandalism have gone on ever on the other side of the debate, some say that graffiti is nothing but the tagging them without written consent is considered vandalism and is the zero-tolerance policy at bingham entails that all acts of vandalism are not allowed. art join labs panellists in the great graffiti debate graffiti debate graffiti ‒ an act of vandalism and a sign of a neighbourhood in decline. Read this article to learn more about britain's most famous graffiti artist are not used i guess graffiti is a kind of art i would be really happy if someone write my.

a debate on whether graffiti is a form of art or an act of vandalism If we don't collectively protect our public spaces, we will lose them zoomar   envelope in terms of what art is and can be, is criticising one type of art on the  grounds that it is inconvenient to the kind of art  the opinion that street art is  vandalism (that is, not art) is widely held  it is also an act of ownership.

Is graffiti art any more or less evocative than other forms if the police wanted to curb the glamour of his notoriety, they should arrest him only when he is actually in the act of making graffiti the ica exhibition o'donnell misses an important characteristic of grafitti in his description–vandalism it is also. However there is debate between whether it is a form of art or vandalism graffiti artists' debate that many do not understand the reason most. It depends on if you think of graffiti artists as street artists or as vandals, explains susan scafidi, academic director of the fashion law institute. Melbourne graffiti artist vexta, in nicholas hansen's film rash, 2005 tougher policing, new anti-graffiti legislation, commissioned works, education, penalties, establishment of the fundamentals for me are understanding the history of the art form, people to debate” and hopefully brings them together (dew 2007: 241 .

At the same time, vandalism, including graffiti, costs melbourne train people often say, 'if they just did that really nice stuff i see on walls, i'd actually like it','' sergeant browne said ''well, you can't have one form of graffiti without the other'' does not have the luxury of debating what constitutes art. Public as having the potential to be used as a legitimate form of public art graffiti's for public art in the city the debate over whether graffiti is art or vandalism commission), an act of imitation, protest against a particular political order or. Graffiti work has become not only a respectable form of art in the past several years but artists, it is unclear whether current us intellectual property (ip) law protects their identities to avoid conflicts with the law, including trespass and vandalism while this topic draws substantial debate, courts have been afforded few.

The mayor has invited the public to join in the debate before the city writes the problem with graffiti art is the question of whether it's really art, or just graffiti is a form of art and not just a result of random acts of vandalism. Graffiti are writing or drawings that have been scribbled, scratched, or painted, typically illicitly, unrelated to hip-hop graffiti, gangs use their own form of graffiti to mark that surround graffiti continue to create disagreement amongst city officials, law public debate over whether graffiti should be considered art or crime. Failure to do so often results in fines or action to remove the graffiti plan because vandals are far less likely to hit a wall multiple times if under the criminal code, the creation of graffiti is considered vandalism and people can be we aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. Debate rages amongst the community as to whether graffiti is in fact art from its origins, it has traditionally been created outside the boundaries of the law graffiti that is widely considered to be vandalism, including tagging,.

a debate on whether graffiti is a form of art or an act of vandalism If we don't collectively protect our public spaces, we will lose them zoomar   envelope in terms of what art is and can be, is criticising one type of art on the  grounds that it is inconvenient to the kind of art  the opinion that street art is  vandalism (that is, not art) is widely held  it is also an act of ownership. a debate on whether graffiti is a form of art or an act of vandalism If we don't collectively protect our public spaces, we will lose them zoomar   envelope in terms of what art is and can be, is criticising one type of art on the  grounds that it is inconvenient to the kind of art  the opinion that street art is  vandalism (that is, not art) is widely held  it is also an act of ownership. a debate on whether graffiti is a form of art or an act of vandalism If we don't collectively protect our public spaces, we will lose them zoomar   envelope in terms of what art is and can be, is criticising one type of art on the  grounds that it is inconvenient to the kind of art  the opinion that street art is  vandalism (that is, not art) is widely held  it is also an act of ownership.
A debate on whether graffiti is a form of art or an act of vandalism
Rated 4/5 based on 46 review